Quantifying expert opinion with discrete choice models: Invasive elodea's influence on Alaska salmonids
Name:
Publisher version
View Source
Access full-text PDFOpen Access
View Source
Check access options
Check access options
Keyword
AlaskaDiscrete choice method
Elodea spp.
Expert elicitation
Invasive species management
Salmonids
Metadata
Show full item recordURI
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479720308537; http://hdl.handle.net/11122/11183Abstract
Scientific evidence should inform environmental policy, but rapid environmental change brings high ecological uncertainty and associated barriers to the science-management dialogue. Biological invasions of aquatic plants are a worldwide problem with uncertain ecological and economic consequences. We demonstrate that the discrete choice method (DCM) can serve as a structured expert elicitation alternative to quantify expert opinion across a range of possible but uncertain environmental outcomes. DCM is widely applied in the social sciences to better understand and predict human preferences and trade-offs. Here we apply it to Alaska's first submersed invasive aquatic freshwater plant, Elodea spp. (elodea), and its unknown effects on salmonids. While little is known about interactions between elodea and salmonids, ecological research suggests that aquatic plant invasions can have positive and negative, as well as direct and indirect, effects on fish. We use DCM to design hypothetical salmonid habitat scenarios describing elodea's possible effect on critical environmental conditions for salmonids: prey abundance, dissolved oxygen, and vegetation cover. We then observe how experts choose between scenarios that they believe could support persistent salmonid populations in elodea-invaded salmonid habitat. We quantify the relative importance of habitat characteristics that influence expert choice and investigate how experts trade off between habitat characteristics. We take advantage of Bayesian techniques to estimate discrete choice models for individual experts and to simulate expert opinion for specific environmental management situations. We discuss possible applications and advantages of the DCM approach for expert elicitation in the ecological context. We end with methodological questions for future research.Date
2020-10-01Publisher
ElsevierType
Articleae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110924