Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMcDiarmid, G. Williamson
dc.contributor.authorVinten-Johansen, P.
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-17T01:06:55Z
dc.date.available2021-11-17T01:06:55Z
dc.date.issued1996
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11122/12450
dc.description.abstractFew educational slogans have had more play over the last decade than “writing to learn”. The idea is intuitively appealing: that in striving to summarize, organize, synthesize, develop, and communicate ideas and information, we must, in the process, clarify and extend our own understandings. Many have championed the “writing to learn” cause. In the study described below, the first author, Vinten-Johansen, engaged his undergraduates, all of whom planned to teach, in a structured process of writing historical narratives. His purpose was to help them learn not only to make historical arguments in writing—a capacity that has applications far beyond academic history—but also to analyze the narratives of others as contestable products. In what follows, we examine the opportunities that Vinten-Johansen created to help students learn to write, the successive drafts of original narratives they produced, and their discussions of historical methods and reasoning. Our purpose is to explore whether a highly structured experience in writing historical narratives does help students learn this form of writing and the character of historical knowledge.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherInstitute of Social and Economic Research, University of Alaska.en_US
dc.subjectwriting to learnen_US
dc.subjectundergraduateen_US
dc.subjecthistorical narrativesen_US
dc.subjectreasoningen_US
dc.subjecthistorical knowledgeen_US
dc.titleStalking the Schoolwork Module: Teaching Prospective Teachers to Write Historical Narrativesen_US
dc.typeReporten_US
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-17T01:06:56Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
gwm797.PDF
Size:
159.7Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record