Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFoster, Mark
dc.contributor.authorColt, Steve
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-17T19:40:45Z
dc.date.available2021-11-17T19:40:45Z
dc.date.issued1995
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11122/12470
dc.description.abstractA very large industrial facility such as the proposed Midrex iron ore reduction facility would make a pipeline economically feasible, but the resulting cost of gas to consumers would still be about twice the level of current Enstar rates, due to higher local distribution costs. Also, under this scenario customers along the pipeline route would not automatically have access to cheap gas unless they were clustered in groups of at least 10 people within about one mile of the connection to the main line. This study examines the economics of bringing natural gas to Homer, Seward, and intermediate points along the Sterling Highway. We conclude that natural gas delivered by pipeline to Homer or Seward from the existing Enstar system will remain uneconomical or marginally competitive with diesel under plausible assumptions about economic growth. That's because both Homer and Seward have very small numbers of customers compared to the cost of a pipeline necessary to reach either community.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipCity of Homer; the City of Seward; Alaska Department of Community and Regional Affairs, Division of Energy; Kenai Peninsula Borough Economic Development District, Inc.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherInstitute of Social and Economic Research, University of Alaska.en_US
dc.subjectiron ore reduction facilityen_US
dc.subjectpipelineen_US
dc.subjectdistribution costsen_US
dc.subjectnatural gasen_US
dc.subjectscenariosen_US
dc.titleKenai Peninsula Natural Gas Study: Final Reporten_US
dc.typeReporten_US
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-17T19:40:46Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
1995-KenaiGas.pdf
Size:
6.056Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Report

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record