Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGalloway, Aaron W. E.
dc.contributor.authorDassow, G. Von
dc.contributor.authorSchram, Julie B.
dc.contributor.authorKlinger, T.
dc.contributor.authorHill, T. M.
dc.contributor.authorLowe, A. T.
dc.contributor.authorChan, F.
dc.contributor.authorYoshioka, R. M.
dc.contributor.authorKroeker, K. J.
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-02T23:03:26Z
dc.date.available2022-05-02T23:03:26Z
dc.date.issued2020-10-23
dc.identifier.citationGalloway, AWE; von Dassow, G,; Schram, JB; Klinger, T; Hill, TM; Lowe, AT; Chan, F; Yoshioka, R; Kroeker, KJ (2020) Ghost factors of laboratory carbonate chemistry are haunting our experiments. Biol Bull 239 (3) https://doi.org/10.1086/711242en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11122/12867
dc.description.abstractFor many historical and contemporary experimental studies in marine biology, seawater carbonate chemistry remains a ghost factor, an uncontrolled, unmeasured, and often dynamic variable affecting experimental organisms or the treatments to which investigators subject them. We highlight how environmental variability, such as seasonal upwelling and biological respiration, drive variation in seawater carbonate chemistry that can influence laboratory experiments in unintended ways and introduce a signal consistent with ocean acidification. As the impacts of carbonate chemistry on biochemical pathways that underlie growth, development, reproduction, and behavior become better understood, the hidden effects of this previously overlooked variable need to be acknowledged. Here we bring this emerging challenge to the attention of the wider community of experimental biologists who rely on access to organisms and water from marine and estuarine laboratories and who may benefit from explicit considerations of a growing literature on the pervasive effects of aquatic carbonate chemistry changes.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipAWEG and JBS were supported by Oregon Sea Grant (OSG; R/ECO-37-Galloway1820) from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s National Sea Grant College Program, from the U.S. Department of Commerce, and by appropriations made by the Oregon State Legislature. GvD was supported by grants from the National Science Foundation (NSF; MCB-1614606) and National Institutes of Health (GM052932). RMY was supported by the NSF Graduate Research Fellowship (1309047). FC was supported by OSG (R/ ECO-32-Chan). KJK was supported by the David and Lucille Packard Foundation and the NSF (OCE-1752600). The statements, findings, conclusions, and recommendations are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of these funders. We appreciate the thoughtful and constructive comments from two anonymous peer reviewersen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherThe University of Chicagoen_US
dc.subjectGhost factoren_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental variabilityen_US
dc.subjectSeasonal upwellingen_US
dc.subjectSeawater carbonateen_US
dc.subjectCarbonate chemistryen_US
dc.titleGhost Factors of Laboratory Carbonate Chemistry Are Haunting Our Experimentsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.description.peerreviewYesen_US
refterms.dateFOA2022-05-02T23:03:27Z
dc.identifier.journalThe Biological Bulletinen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
2020_ Schram_Ghost Factors of ...
Size:
2.323Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Main Article

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record