• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • University of Alaska Fairbanks
    • UAF Graduate School
    • Physics
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • University of Alaska Fairbanks
    • UAF Graduate School
    • Physics
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of Scholarworks@UACommunitiesPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeThis CollectionPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsType

    My Account

    Login

    First Time Submitters, Register Here

    Register

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Generalized modeling of complex dynamical systems: an application to the stability of ecological networks

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    Awender_S_2023.pdf
    Size:
    9.041Mb
    Format:
    PDF
    Download
    Author
    Awender, Stefan
    Chair
    Wackerbauer, Renate
    Breed, Greg
    Committee
    Newman, David
    Doak, Pat
    Keyword
    Food chains
    Biotic communities
    Differentiable dynamical systems
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/11122/13228
    Abstract
    Understanding the stability of food webs is crucial for resource sustainability and conservation of ecosystems, especially in the context of climate change. Specific models describe the biomass flow in food webs by a set of ordinary differential equations that require the explicit reconstruction of a mathematical expression for each of the interactions or processes, like predator-prey interactions, primary production, and mortality. Although specific models are rich with time-evolution information, limited access for empirical observation of these typically immense systems induce uncertainty in the data and approximations in the corresponding models that can threaten robustness or relevance of results. Generalized models can produce the stability of all the equilibria of specific models that have the same vague structure and bypasses the requirement to specify every function by evoking a normalizing transformation. The analysis is subsequently computationally efficient and can be used to study large food webs with a great number of replicates. Often generalized ecological network studies confine the scope to a small subset of the variable dynamical scenarios, but this limits the interpretations that can be inferred. With this in mind, we develop a deterministic food-web generator that can be used to compare large food webs that differ by only a single link and maintain an expansive dynamical scope. We found behavior that indicates the existence of critical links and a grander theory on topological equivalence. We explicitly show how we can create hypothetical paths the system may traverse upon enrichment of lower trophic levels using the expanded dynamical scope. Generalized modeling is unable to produce evolution solutions among other things, but it has an unlimiting access to the stability of equilibria while specific models provide only a subset of stability data. Generalized modeling is a relatively new method and its relation to specific model outcomes/results is not clearly understood. Specific models can inform generalized modeling studies on properties like coexistence of fixed points or actually occurring relative weighting of flows between ecosystem members. We combined the methods and demonstrated the validity of the abstract technique of generalized modeling in emphasis to its usefulness/power for the analysis of network stability. The specific model provided a unifying explanation to a conglomerate of related microcosm experiments that showed conflicting results on enrichment and implied stabilization upon the hampering of predatory efficiency. We identified the conditions by which enrichment is stabilizing to a steady state when basal species are in a resource-deprived environment but destabilizing if resources become more abundant. A prevalent issue in ecology involves discrepancies between simulation and empirical observation about food-web stability such as how intuition says enrichment or complexity in some way are favorable to stability but mathematical models find it predominately the opposite. A common rationalization for these discrepancies includes discourse on reductionistic versus holistic rhetoric. The idea being that as models become better representations of ecosystems that capture more intricacies and detail, they will help to resolve the issue. We constructed over a million food webs that reveal positive effects on fixed-point stability from the incorporation of more realistic ecosystem features that include species specialization, habitat modularity, and predator's prey preferences. Arctic warming is a portent to changes in species composition and ecological theory predicts the existence of key ecosystem members that have extraordinary influence on overall ecosystem function or the state of the system. Motivated by sea-ice loss and northward expansion of species distributions, ice-obligate species are removed from the food webs and southern competitors are introduced. Although it is common understanding that apex predators can enhance biodiversity, we find the presence of "super killers" significantly destabilizes food webs. Ecosystems have immense complexity with thousands of species, but ecosystem models condense and consider only a few species that are of the most interest or abundance, neglecting the many weak interactions comprising the larger ecosystem. Considering this, we suppose a food web is subsumed by a larger phantom ecological network that represents hypothetically rare species or predator-prey relationships. Each link from the phantom network contributes a variably weak perturbation, but collectively, induce a net positive effect on the average stability of the food webs, considerably so near the optimal perturbation strength.
    Description
    Dissertation (Ph.D.) University of Alaska Fairbanks, 2023
    Table of Contents
    Chapter 1: introduction -- 1.1. Ecological background -- 1.2. Dynamical systems -- 1.2.1. Example: one-dimensional flows -- 1.2.2. Example: two-dimensional flows -- 1.3. Lotka-volterra competition -- 1.3.1. Specific model -- 1.3.2. Conventional nondimensionalization -- 1.3.3. Normalizing nondimensionalization -- 1.3.4. Generalized model -- 1.3.5. Connecting the generalized model to the specific model -- 1.4. A different view of the system: combining processes -- 1.5. Synopsis -- 1.6. References. Chapter 2: stability of generalized ecological network models -- 2.1. Abstract -- 2.2. Abstract extension -- 2.3. Introduction -- 2.4. Model -- V2.4.1. Food web topology -- 2.4.2. Food web dynamics -- 2.4.3. Generalized modeling -- 2.5. Sensitivity to topology -- 2.6. Predatory response and stability -- 2.7. Paradox of enrichment -- 2.8. Omnivory: food chains to food webs -- 2.9. Complexity-stability debate and the ratio of intermediate to top predators -- 2.10. Conclusion -- 2.11. References. Chapter 3: Combining generalized modeling and specific modeling in the analysis of ecological networks -- 3.1. Abstract -- 3.2. Abstract extension -- 3.3. Introduction -- 3.4. Model -- 3.4.1. Generalized model -- 3.4.2. Specific models -- 3.5. Four-species food web and analysis -- 3.5.1. Specific model and steady states -- 3.5.2. Generalized parameters -- 3.5.3. Generalized versus specific model: parameter scenarios -- 3.6. Interface of specific and generalized model -- 3.7. Robustness of stability for various basal production -- 3.8. Enrichment stabilizes and destabilizes -- 3.9. Adding the omnivorous link stabilizes -- 3.10. Coexisting fixed points -- 3.11. Feeding nonlinearities and stability -- 3.12. Weighting of links in steady state -- 3.13. Conclusion -- 3.14. References. Chapter 4: How realistic features affect the stability of an Arctic marine food web model -- 4.1. Introduction -- 4.2. The Beaufort Sea food web -- 4.3. Food web dynamics -- 4.3.1. Generalized ecological model -- 4.3.2. Generalized parameters for the base model -- 4.3.3. Measuring stability -- 4.4. Impact of refined species characteristics on stability -- 4.4.1. Adjusting the base model -- 4.4.2. Results -- 4.5. Impact of species introduction and removal on stability -- 4.6. Impact of background species on stability -- 4.6.1. Adjusting the model -- 4.6.2. Results -- 4.7. Conclusion -- 4.8. References. Chapter 5: Conclusion -- References.
    Date
    2023-05
    Type
    Dissertation
    Collections
    Physics

    entitlement

     
    ABOUT US|HELP|BROWSE|ADVANCED SEARCH

    The University of Alaska is an affirmative action/equal opportunity employer, educational institution and provider and prohibits illegal discrimination against any individual.

    Learn more about UA’s notice of nondiscrimination.

    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.