Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBennett, Alec
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-03T21:50:24Z
dc.date.available2024-07-03T21:50:24Z
dc.date.issued2024-05
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11122/15130
dc.descriptionDissertation (Ph.D.) University of Alaska Fairbanks, 2024en_US
dc.description.abstractClimate security as an emerging field of study seeks to connect the substantial security-related challenges faced under climate change, and the ways in which climate change re-prioritizes issues at all scales of governance, and throughout all parts of society. This dissertation explores these perspectives to better understand how climate security differs from past approaches in security, and how climate change requires new paradigms to consider local, national, regional, and international assessments on risk and security. Through three papers, this dissertation assesses local approaches toward shifts in natural hazards through computational modeling, explores regional and global governance challenges that generate ethical and security concerns through attempts to mitigate climate impacts via geoengineering, and identifies current limitations on risk and security dialogues, particularly where conflict and disasters intertwine. The final paper also proposes a new conceptual model to advance approaches on assessing critical failure, the limits of mutual aid, and the assessment of "just securitization" when a referent of analysis faces significant impacts from disruptive events. This dissertation connects these issues of scale and dimensions of security to present climate security as a deeply interconnected and widely impacting issue that requires common framing and dialogues to prioritize capacity and understand limitations of future adaptation.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsChapter 1: General introduction -- 1.1. Introduction -- 1.2. Dimensions of climate security -- 1.3. Issues of scale -- 1.4. Three perspectives on climate security -- 1.4.1. Interior Alaska hydrological extremes -- 1.4.2. Arctic geoengineering -- 1.4.3. Security tipping points -- 1.5. Summary of themes -- 1.6. References. Chapter 2: Modeling of future streamflow hazards in Interior Alaska river systems and implications for applied planning -- 2.1. Abstract -- 2.2. Introduction -- 2.3. Background -- 2.3.1. Study area -- 2.3.2. Flood control and flood events -- 2.3.3. Streamflow gages -- 2.3.4. Discontinuous and sporadic permafrost -- 2.3.5. Hazard assessment -- 2.4. Methods -- 2.4.1. Model setup -- 2.4.2. Domain setup -- 2.4.3. Forcing data -- 2.4.4. Bias correction -- 2.4.5. Calibration -- 2.5. Results -- 2.5.1. Calibration results -- 2.5.2. Model divergence -- 2.5.3. Seasonality -- 2.5.4. Flood control implications -- 2.6. Discussion -- 2.6.1. Model limitations -- 2.6.2. Implications for decision-making -- 2.6.3. Future improvements -- 2.7. Conclusion -- 2.8. Acknowledgments -- 2.9. References. Chapter 3: Arctic sea ice decline and geoengineering solutions: cascading security and ethical considerations -- 3.1. Abstract -- 3.2. Introduction -- 3.3. Current environment of the Arctic -- 3.4. Arctic geoengineering solutions -- 3.4.1. Solar radiation based geoengineering -- 3.4.2. Thermal geoengineering for ice preservation or production -- 3.5. Security-related challenges with international collaboration -- 3.6. Ethical concerns with broader impacts -- 3.6.1. Target climate -- 3.6.2. Distribution of impacts -- 3.6.3. Unintended consequences of interventions -- 3.6.4. Competition and representative decision-making -- 3.7. Navigating the combined challenges -- 3.7.1. Additional considerations -- 3.7.2. Risk governance -- 3.8. Conclusions -- 3.9. Author contributions -- 3.10. Funding -- 3.11. Institutional review board statement -- 3.12. Informed consent statement -- 3.13. Data availability statement -- 3.14. Acknowledgments -- 3.15. Conflicts of interest -- 3.16. References. Chapter 4: Security tipping points: a measure of securitization -- 4.1. Abstract -- 4.2. Introduction -- 4.3. Connections to securitization theory -- 4.4. Convergence: risk analysis in disaster, infrastructure, and conflict studies -- 4.4.1. Infrastructure risk -- 4.4.2. Disaster risk studies -- 4.4.3. Conflict studies -- 4.4.4. A combined risk function -- 4.5. Key definitions -- 4.6. Framework core -- 4.6.1. Levels of analysis -- 4.6.2. Change over time -- 4.6.3. Inflection points -- 4.6.4. External capacity -- 4.7. Example applications -- 4.7.1. Comparative major disaster (island nation vs. Island territory) -- 4.7.2. Territorial invasion -- 4.7.3. Extending examples -- 4.8. Discussion -- 4.9. Conclusion -- 4.10. References. Chapter 5: General conclusions -- 5.1. Summary of work -- 5.2. Lessons learned -- 5.2.1. Local hazard assessment -- 5.2.2. Local to global security and ethical impacts -- 5.2.3. Tipping points and points of no return -- 5.2.4. Unifying themes -- 5.2.5. Policy implications -- 5.3. Discussion and future work -- 5.4. Final conclusions -- 5.5. References.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectClimatic changesen_US
dc.subjectRisk assessmenten_US
dc.subjectHazardous geographic environmentsen_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental geotechnologyen_US
dc.subjectArctic regionsen_US
dc.subjectClimate change mitigationen_US
dc.subject.otherDoctor of Philosophy in Interdisciplinary Studiesen_US
dc.titleClimate security and scale: climate change risk and security as an all-scales, all-of-society challengeen_US
dc.typeDissertationen_US
dc.type.degreephden_US
dc.identifier.departmentDepartment of Arctic and Northern Studiesen_US
dc.contributor.chairBoylan, Brandon
dc.contributor.committeeCarlson, Cameron
dc.contributor.committeeWebley, Peter
dc.contributor.committeeBennett, Katrina
refterms.dateFOA2024-07-03T21:50:25Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Bennett_A_2024.pdf
Size:
3.875Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record