Utilizing different machine learning algorithms to progress geomagnetic field modeling from solar wind drivers for geomagnetically induced current detection and prevention
dc.contributor.author | Blandin, Matthew | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-10-09T21:19:53Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-10-09T21:19:53Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2024-08 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11122/15459 | |
dc.description | Dissertation (Ph.D.) University of Alaska Fairbanks, 2024 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Geomagnetically induced currents (GICs) are capable of damaging existing infrastructure on the ground with the fear of prolonged and extensive global damage. We aim to predict when and where these GICs may occur with a lead time sufficient to provide preventative actions to mitigate the damage of GICs. We utilize different machine learning algorithms, as part of the Machine-learned Algorithms for GICs in Alaska and New Hampshire (MAGICIAN) team, to create both localized and global predictions of the geomagnetic field from solar wind and interplanetary magnetic field data. In my first paper, I utilize Long-Short Term Memory (LSTM) neural networks with real time magnetometer data to predict the north-south component of the geomagnetic field at 4 loca¬ tions perpendicular to the auroral oval. In my second paper, I use 7 stations of data and split each dataset based on the station’s location in magnetic local time to create 168 unique datasets across the northern hemisphere from 50o to 90o magnetic latitude, creating a global predictive network using convolutional neural networks (CNNs). In my last paper, I utilized a gridded dataset with a residual neural network (ResNet) to create predictions at 600 grid points from 40o to 90o magnetic latitude for a global model enhanced beyond the capabilities of the second paper. Machine learned models are compared to current state of the art empirical models and real data for validation. We find that LSTM networks provide good predictions at individual locations in Alaska, however, do not sup¬ port gridded global predictions with our data input scheme. In the second and third papers we find CNN and ResNet techniques predict GICs more accurately than similar empirical models without smoothing or averaging of the input features. This indicates that these machine learning techniques have the potential to provide insight on which transient solar wind features have an impact on the ground geomagnetic field perturbations. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | NSF EPSCoR Award OIA-1920965 | en_US |
dc.description.tableofcontents | Chapter 1: General introduction. Chapter 2: Multi-variate LSTM prediction of Alaska magnetometer chain utilizing a coupled model approach -- 2.1 Abstract -- 2.2 Introduction -- 2.3 Data and models -- 2.3.1 SuperMAG and OMNIweb data -- 2.3.2 LSTM model -- 2.3.3 Linear regression -- 2.4 Model development and results -- 2.4.1 Geomagnetic field prediction model using CMO dataset -- 2.4.2 Geomagnetic field prediction across the Alaska chain -- 2.4.3 Polarity and coupled model -- 2.5 Discussion -- 2.5.1 Skill scores and model performance -- 2.5.2 LSTM caveats -- 2.5.3 Potential LSTM model use and future work -- 2.6 Summary and future work -- 2.7 References. Chapter 3: Developing a matrix of convolutional neural networks for global geomagnetic field modeling utilizing magnetic local time and latitudinal dependent datasets -- 3.1 Abstract -- 3.2 Introduction -- 3.3 Data -- 3.3.1 SuperMAG -- 3.3.2 ACE -- 3.3.3 Storm selections -- 3.4 Model -- 3.4.1 Convolutional neural network -- 3.5 Results -- 3.5.1 College magnetometer experiment -- 3.5.2 Global application -- 3.5.3 Performance -- 3.6 Discussion -- 3.7 Summary & future work -- 3.8 References. Chapter 4: Residual convolutional neural networks for global geomagnetic field predictions -- 4.1 Abstract -- 4.2 Introduction -- 4.3 Data -- 4.3.1 SuperMAG -- 4.3.2 ACE -- 4.3.3 Storm selections -- 4.4 Model -- 4.4.1 Residual neural network -- 4.4.2 Weimer empirical geomagnetic field model -- 4.5 Results -- 4.6 Discussion -- 4.7 Summary -- 4.8 References. Chapter 5: General conclusions -- 5.1 References. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.subject | Geomagnetism | en_US |
dc.subject | Forecasting | en_US |
dc.subject | Models | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Doctor of Philosophy in Space Physics | en_US |
dc.title | Utilizing different machine learning algorithms to progress geomagnetic field modeling from solar wind drivers for geomagnetically induced current detection and prevention | en_US |
dc.type | Dissertation | en_US |
dc.type.degree | phd | en_US |
dc.identifier.department | Department of Physics | en_US |
dc.contributor.chair | Hampton, Don | |
dc.contributor.chair | Connor, Hyunju K. | |
dc.contributor.committee | Bristow, William | |
dc.contributor.committee | Delamere, Peter | |
dc.contributor.committee | Newman, David | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2024-10-09T21:19:54Z |