Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHenslee, Sara R.
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-04T02:45:21Z
dc.date.available2025-02-04T02:45:21Z
dc.date.issued2024-12
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11122/15681
dc.descriptionThesis (M.S.) University of Alaska Fairbanks, 2024en_US
dc.description.abstractMoose (Alces alces) are a valuable big game species in Alaska and serve as a critical food source for residents. Near Nome, Alaska, the local moose population has remained at low densities for decades, and there is strong public interest in investigating the cause behind the population's failure to increase in abundance. Compared to other moose populations in Alaska, the population of moose near Nome does not appear to be nutritionally limited or close to carrying capacity. I sought to explore how juvenile mass, a widely used metric to assess moose nutritional status in Alaska, influences reproductive output and subsequent calf survival rates in the moose population in Game Management Units 22C and 22D near Nome by estimating calving rates of collared known-age and known-mass female moose and then monitoring their calves. I found that female moose that were heavier as juveniles had a higher probability of calving for the first time at age 2 or 3 and a higher probability of twinning. I found low calf survival rates (18%) through the first year of life and did not find a significant relationship between any maternal or calf characteristics and calf survival. Overall, it appears that this moose population is defined by low calf survival rates but high reproductive rates and high survival after the first year of life. Additionally, the metric of juvenile mass and primiparity as indicators of nutritional status appears to be variable within populations among years and may not be a reliable management tool. Additional research is warranted to further explore the effect of environmental factors on driving variation in primiparity probability.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsChapter 1: General introduction -- 1.1 References. Chapter 2: Effects of juvenile mass on early fecundity in a low-density Alaskan moose population -- 2.1 Abstract -- 2.2 Introduction -- 2.3 Methods -- 2.3.1 Study area -- 2.3.2 Moose capture -- 2.3.3 Moose parturition surveys -- 2.3.4 Data analysis -- 2.4 Results -- 2.4.1 Summary statistics -- 2.4.2 Primiparity probability of moose at age 2 -- 2.4.3 Primiparity probability of moose at age 3 -- 2.4.4 Twinning probability -- 2.5 Discussion -- 2.5.1 Primiparity -- 2.5.2 Twinning -- 2.6 Management implications -- 2.7 References. Chapter 3: Factors affecting calf survival in a low-density Alaskan moose population -- 3.1 Abstract -- 3.2 Introduction -- 3.3 Methods -- 3.3.1 Study area -- 3.3.2 Neonate moose capture -- 3.3.3 Calf mortality monitoring -- 3.3.4 Data analysis -- 3.3.5 Matrix modeling -- 3.4 Results -- 3.4.1 Neonate survival -- 3.4.2 Factors influencing calf survival -- 3.4.3 Matrix modeling -- 3.5 Discussion -- 3.6 Management implications -- 3.7 References. Chapter 4: General conclucions -- 4.1 References.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectMooseen_US
dc.subjectMoose populationsen_US
dc.subjectLongevityen_US
dc.subjectMortalityen_US
dc.subjectNomeen_US
dc.subjectReproductionen_US
dc.subject.otherMaster of Science in Wildlife Biology and Conservationen_US
dc.titleEffects of juvenile mass on reproduction and calf survival in a low-density moose populationen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.type.degreemsen_US
dc.identifier.departmentDepartment of Wildlife Biology and Conservationen_US
dc.contributor.chairCrimmins, Shawn
dc.contributor.chairMuehlbauer, Jeff
dc.contributor.committeeKielland, Knut
dc.contributor.committeeParrett, Lincoln
refterms.dateFOA2025-02-04T02:45:22Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Henslee_S_2024.pdf
Size:
3.701Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Biological Sciences
    Includes WIldlife Biology and other Biological Sciences. For Marine Biology see the Marine Sciences collection.

Show simple item record