Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRansdell-Green, Joseph E.
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-25T19:28:14Z
dc.date.available2025-06-25T19:28:14Z
dc.date.issued2025-05
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11122/15986
dc.descriptionThesis (M.A.) University of Alaska Fairbanks, 2025en_US
dc.description.abstractCollective action has great importance in solving many socio-ecological issues because the sustainable management of natural resources requires that different people and institutions cooperate with one another to contribute to a collective good. Over the past sixty years, two general theories of collective action have formed. These theories continue to influence debates about what factors drive collective action. In the 1960s, first-generation collective action scholars proposed that laws from centralized governments or privatization were needed to combat collective action problems such as overpopulation and overexploitation of resources. Second- generation scholars argue that groups can self-organize to solve collective action problems. Elinor Ostrom and other scholars have used empirical evidence to show that groups are able to effect collective action independently of external factors. These researchers argue that social norms and values supporting reciprocity, fairness, and trustworthiness play an important role in successful collective action. These various forms of social phenomena, such as relationships and trust, are known as social capital. To investigate the factors of collective action, I partnered with the Indigenous Peoples Council for Marine Mammals (IPCoMM), an umbrella organization of marine mammal co-management Alaska Native Organizations. IPCoMM member organizations work with Alaska Native communities and U.S. federal agencies to jointly manage marine mammal species under the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972. This project is the first collective action research to be conducted in partnership with IPCoMM. The research reveals that the organizations are supporting their collective action efforts by strong relationships with one another and with federal agencies. Trust is one of the most important aspects of these relationships. The relationship-building and trust-building factors that foster collective action for IPCoMM include long-term relationships, frequent communication, face-to-face communication, respect for other viewpoints, inclusion within organizations, humility, personal bonds, and promise keeping. This research demonstrates that trustful relationships (or social capital) are integral to bringing diverse partners together for innovation and collaboration, and promoting collective action in marine mammal co-management in Alaska.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsChapter 1: Introduction -- 1.1 Introduction -- 1.2 Indigenous Peoples Council for Marine Mammals -- 1.3 Research questions -- 1.4 Research findings -- 1.5 Thesis overview. Chapter 2: Data collection and methodology -- 2.1 Introduction -- 2.2 Memorandum of understanding -- 2.3 Data collection -- 2.3.1 Semi-structures interviews -- 2.3.2 Participant recruitment -- 2.3.3 Interview consent forms -- 2.4 Grounded Theory -- 2.4.1 Why use Grounded Theory? -- 2.4.2 Principles of Grounded Theory -- 2.5 Coding -- 2.6 Memos -- 2.7 Motivation for the research -- 2.8 Reflecting on bias -- 2.9 Limitations. Chapter 3: Literature review -- 3.1 Introduction -- 3.2 Collective action -- 3.2.1 First-generation collective action theories -- 3.2.2 Second-generation collective theories -- 3.3 Co-management -- 3.4 Social capital -- 3.5 Literature review of empirical categories -- Trust -- 3.5.2 Long-term relationships -- 3.5.3 Frequent communication -- 3.5.4 Face-to-face communication -- 3.5.5 Respect -- 3.5.6 Inclusion -- 3.5.7 Humility -- 3.5.8 Promise keeping -- 3.6 How to grow social capital -- 3.7 Filling a research gap -- 3.7.1 New factors in trust-building and relationship-building within IPCoMM -- 3.7.2 Strong relationships lead to innovation -- 3.7.3 Innovative projects combat structural impediments -- 3.7.4 Support for second-generation collective action research -- 3.8 Conclusion. Chapter 4: History of marine mammal co-management in Alaska -- 4.1 Introduction -- 4.2 The International Whaling Commission -- 4.3 The Marine Mammal Protection Act -- 4.4 The Alaska Eskimo Whaling Commission -- 4.4.1 Gaining respect -- 4.4.2 A political fight -- 4.4.3 Indigenous led research -- 4.4.4 A negative relationship -- 4.4.5 A cooperative agreement -- 4.5 Additional co-management Alaska Native organizations -- 4.6 An umbrella organization -- 4.7 The 1994 MMPA Amendments and Section 119 -- 4.8 Co-management challenges -- 4.8.1 The Marine Mammal Commission co-management reviews -- 4.8.2 A history of distrust -- 4.8.3 Low co-management funding and capacity -- 4.8.4 Federal bureaucratic structures -- 4.9 Conclusion. Chapter 5: Empirical findings -- 5.1 Introduction -- 5.2 Long-term relationships -- 5.3 Long-term relationships -- 5.4 Face-to-face communication -- 5.5 Trust-building practices within relationships -- 5.5.1 Respect for other viewpoints -- 5.5.2 Inclusion -- 5.5.3 Humility -- 5.5.4 Personal bonds -- 5.5.5 Promise keeping -- 5.6 An example of rebuilding trust -- 5.7 The benefits of trust in IPCoMM -- 5.8 Structural impediments to collective action -- 5.8.1 Divisions in co-management structure -- 5.8.2 Competitive grant system -- 5.8.3 Capacity inequalities -- 5.8.4 Bureaucracy -- 5.8.5 Limited funding -- 5.8.5.1 Limited funding impacts relationships -- 5.8.5.2 Limited funding impacts capacity -- 5.9 Relationships foster collective action for IPCoMM -- 5.9.1 ANO-agency partnerships advocating for more federal funding -- 5.9.2 Alaska Native Organization partnerships share capacity -- 5.9.3 Shared services -- 5.9.4 New partnerships with outside funders -- 5.10 Conclusion. Chapter 6: Conclusion -- 6.1 Conclusion -- 6.2 Feedback from IPCoMM.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectIndigenous Peoples Council for Marine Mammalsen_US
dc.subjectNatural resourcesen_US
dc.subjectCo-managementen_US
dc.subjectPublic-private sector cooperationen_US
dc.subjectInstitutional cooperationen_US
dc.subjectSocial capital (Sociology)en_US
dc.subject.otherMaster of Arts in Arctic and Northern Studiesen_US
dc.titleCollective action in marine mammal co-management: relationships as tools of cooperationen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.type.degreemaen_US
dc.identifier.departmentArctic and Northern Studies Programen_US
dc.contributor.chairWight, Philip
dc.contributor.committeeMeek, Chanda
dc.contributor.committeeEhrlander, Mary
refterms.dateFOA2025-06-25T19:28:16Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
RansdellGreen_J_2025.pdf
Size:
2.552Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record