Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorStrailey, Kaarle P.
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-26T00:45:04Z
dc.date.available2025-06-26T00:45:04Z
dc.date.issued2025-05
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11122/15990
dc.descriptionThesis (M.S.) University of Alaska Fairbanks, 2025en_US
dc.description.abstractHeating and cooling buildings consumes around 17% of global energy demand. Improved thermal insulation can reduce much of this consumption with positive implications for energy security and economic opportunity. For over 25 years vacuum insulation panels (VIPs) have been considered a highly promising thermal insulation solution for building envelopes. VIPs can potentially provide an order of magnitude greater insulative performance than common insulation materials with the same thickness. However, the adoption of VIPs in buildings is hindered by many factors: their relatively high costs, installation challenges due to fragility, inalterability, and limited dimensions; limited service life in comparison to buildings due to loss of vacuum over time; susceptibility to thermal bridging along their edges; and other issues. An innovative concept in vacuum insulation technology, active vacuum insulation, is being developed to address many of these challenges. Incorporating a connection to a vacuum pump enables use of cheaper materials and equipment for on-site assembly and evacuation of customizable, large (for example, a whole wall) active vacuum insulation panels (active-VIPs). Vacuum can be extended indefinitely through occasional reactivation of the vacuum pump. For the project described in this thesis, a proof-of-concept active vacuum insulated building envelope prototype was developed. Large active-VIPs were produced and integrated with a vacuum assembly that created, monitored, and maintained internal vacuum. Over a one month trial period an average pressure of about 68 mTorr was maintained and the average R-value per inch of the active-VIPs was around 50 hr∙ft2∙°F∕Btu∕in. This was achieved using a minimal amount of electrical energy for the vacuum pump, representing less than 5% of the thermal energy saved thanks to the vacuum pump. These results indicate that active vacuum insulation is a worthwhile innovation for continued investment in research and development.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipOffice of Naval Research (ONR) Award # N00014-19-1-2235 and Award #N00014-22-1-2049en_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsChapter 1: Introduction -- 1.1 Overview -- 1.2 Research goal and objectives -- 1.3 Scope and limitations -- 1.4 Thesis organization -- 1.5 Explanations and definitions -- Chapter 2: Literature review -- 2.1 Global energy context -- 2.2 Vacuum insulation technology overview -- 2.2.1 History of vacuum insulation -- 2.2.2 Vacuum insulation principles -- 2.2.3 VIP components and assembly -- 2.3 Obstacles to wider adoption of VIPs for building insulation -- 2.4 Potential solution: active vacuum insulation -- Chapter 3: Developing the active vacuum insulated building envelope prototype -- 3.1 Design considerations -- 3.2 General design -- 3.2.1 Protecting the floor panel and supporting the ceiling panel -- 3.2.2 Vacuum assembly -- 3.3 Assembling the active vacuum insulated building envelope prototype -- 3.3.1 Panel construction -- 3.3.2 Active vacuum insulated building envelope prototype assembly -- 3.4 Results -- Chapter 4: Evaluating thermal resistivity of active VIPs -- 4.1 Methods -- 4.1.1 Instrumentation and installation -- 4.1.2 General operation -- 4.2 Calculations and results: time averaged R-value per inch of prototype active-VIPs -- 4.2.1 Active-VIP R-value per inch calculated from effective R-value of the prototype -- 4.2.2 Representative Center of Panel (COP) R-value per inch obtained from heat, flux measurements -- 4.2.3 Discussion -- 4.3 Evaluating the relationship between active-VIP thermal resistivity and internal pressure -- 4.3.1 Discussion -- Chapter 5: Energy consumption of vacuum pressure maintenance and net energy implications -- 5.1 Methods and results -- 5.2 Discussion -- Chapter 6: Conclusions and recommendations -- 6.1 Conclusions -- 6.2 Recommendations -- References.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectInsulation (Heat)en_US
dc.subjectTechnological innovationsen_US
dc.subject.otherMaster of Science in Interdisciplinary Studiesen_US
dc.titleDeveloping a proof-of-concept non-scalable active vacuum insulated building envelope prototypeen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.type.degreemsen_US
dc.identifier.departmentDepartment of Mechanical Engineeringen_US
dc.contributor.chairMarsik, Tom
dc.contributor.chairHuang, Daisy
dc.contributor.committeeBray, Matthew
refterms.dateFOA2025-06-26T00:45:05Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Strailey_K_2025.pdf
Size:
4.396Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record