Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHay, Mitchell R.
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-01T01:28:59Z
dc.date.available2025-11-01T01:28:59Z
dc.date.issued2025-08
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11122/16247
dc.descriptionThesis (M.S.) University of Alaska Fairbanks, 2025en_US
dc.description.abstractCubeSat missions rely heavily on effective communication systems in order to transmit and receive large amounts of data quickly and efficiently. The total throughput is limited by the capacity of the channel - a quantity dependent upon the signal quality and bandwidth of the link. Volume and power constraints on a CubeSat impede overall capacity in a fixed bandwidth channel. Phased-array antennas provide a more power efficient solution to improving signal quality by optimizing the spatial properties of the link, rather than broadcasting higher signal power over a broader area through power amplification alone. In order to take advantage of a larger antenna gain without having to mechanically rotate, the array must be controlled properly such that the radiated power is focused in the desired direction. The appropriate steering vector can be determined autonomously through Retrodirective beamforming - a process where the characteristics of arriving signals are used to determine the direction of arrival, and the resulting array directivity is maximized in that direction. In order to accommodate enough bandwidth to transmit and receive at separate frequencies, a low-profile antenna element was developed in this work and arrayed for a 1U CubeSat. The individual circularly-polarized antenna element shows a wide measured impedance bandwidth of 21% (for a 2:1 VSWR) at a low profile of 0.34λ0 × 0.39λ0 × 0.025λ0. The resulting gain of the circularly polarized array averaged a realized gain of ~10-dBic between 2.0 and 2.3-GHz, yielding roughly twice the gain of traditional planar CubeSat antennas at these frequencies, with the added bonus of an array interface for potential beam-steerability.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsChapter 1: Introduction -- 1.1 Background -- 1.2 Satellite communication link performance -- 1.3 Phased array antennas -- 1.4 Performance considerations -- 1.5 Thesis overview. Chapter 2: Microstrip patch antennas -- 2.1 Advantages and disadvantages -- 2.2 Microstrip patch design and analysis -- 2.3 Finite Element Methods (FEM) -- 2.4 Feeding methods -- 2.5 Probe-fed rectangular patch antenna -- 2.6 Impedance bandwidth optimization. Chapter 3: Broadband microstrip antennas -- 3.1 Stacked microstrip antenna -- 3.2 Aperture coupled microstrip patch antenna -- 3.3 Offset apertures -- 3.4 Crossed slots. Chapter 4: Proposed antenna architecture -- 4.1 Mushroom antennas -- 4.2 Unit-cell design -- 4.3 Antenna design -- 4.4 Open-ended stubs. Chapter 5: Antenna realization -- 5.1 Ground plane and connector optimization -- 5.2 Via plating -- 5.3 Analysis refinement -- 5.4 Array design. Chapter 6: Array fabrication and testing -- 6.1 2-port calibration methods -- 6.2 Measured element port responses -- 6.3 Measured array port responses -- 6.4 Far-field calibration methods -- 6.5 Antenna element measurements -- 6.6 Antenna array measurements. Chapter 7: Conclusions -- 7.1 Antenna performance evaluation -- 7.2 System performance evaluation -- 7.2 System performance -- 7.3 Risk reduction -- 7.4 Future work -- References.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectMicrostrip antennasen_US
dc.subject.otherMaster of Science in Electrical Engineeringen_US
dc.titleDevelopment of low-profile wideband microstrip antennas for CubeSat phased-array applicationsen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.type.degreemsen_US
dc.identifier.departmentDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineeringen_US
dc.contributor.chairThorsen, Denise
dc.contributor.committeeHatfield, Michael
dc.contributor.committeeSonwalkar, Vikas


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Hay_M_2025.pdf
Embargo:
2026-08-18
Size:
9.298Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record