Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGoldsmith, Oliver Scott
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-05T18:10:25Z
dc.date.available2014-06-05T18:10:25Z
dc.date.issued2014-01
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11122/3809
dc.description.abstractThis is the third update of a series we began in 2012, estimating how much Alaska’s state government can afford to spend, without risking sudden big budget deficits and economic hardships for Alaskans in the near future. Those problems are looming because oil revenues currently pay almost all the bills for public services—and oil production has been dropping since the late 1980s. But Alaska can extend the benefits from oil, by adding to the Permanent Fund and other financial accounts—so the earnings from financial accounts can increasingly take the place of petroleum revenues. Those revenues are expected to keep dropping, even with revenues from new oil sources and from a potential gas pipeline.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNorthrim Bank.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherInstitute of Social and Economic Research, University of Alaska Anchorageen_US
dc.titleMaximum Sustainable Yield: FY 2015 Updateen_US
dc.title.alternativeWeb Note No. 16en_US
dc.typeReporten_US
refterms.dateFOA2020-02-26T01:15:39Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
2014_01-WebNote16-MaximumSusta ...
Size:
370.3Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record