Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMartin, Stephanie
dc.contributor.authorPicard, LuAnn
dc.contributor.authorAyers, Mark
dc.contributor.authorHoffman, David B.
dc.contributor.authorMock, Kenrick
dc.date.accessioned2014-09-26T21:17:33Z
dc.date.available2014-09-26T21:17:33Z
dc.date.issued2008-04
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11122/4431
dc.description.abstractA laska’s election system is among the most secure in the country, and it has a number of safeguards other states are now adopting. But the technology Alaska uses to record and count votes could be improved— and the state’s huge size, limited road system, and scattered communities also create special challenges for insuring the integrity of the vote. In this second phase of an ongoing study of Alaska’s election security, we recommend ways of strengthening the system—not only the technology but also the election procedures. The lieutenant governor and the Division of Elections asked the University of Alaska Anchorage to do this evaluation, which began in September 2007.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipLieutenant Governor Sean Parnell. Alaska Division of Elections.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Alaska Anchorageen_US
dc.titleAlaska Election Security Report, Phase 2, Executive Summaryen_US
dc.typeReporten_US
refterms.dateFOA2020-02-26T01:14:45Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
electsec_ph2_final.pdf
Size:
1.052Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record