• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • University of Alaska Fairbanks
    • UAF Graduate School
    • Arctic and Northern Studies
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • University of Alaska Fairbanks
    • UAF Graduate School
    • Arctic and Northern Studies
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of Scholarworks@UACommunitiesPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeThis CollectionPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsType

    My Account

    Login

    First Time Submitters, Register Here

    Register

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Confronting 'Kymlicka's dilemma': settler voting rights, indigenous representation and the 1998-99 electoral reapportionment in Canada's Northwest Territories

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    Spitzer_uaf_0006N_10361.pdf
    Size:
    9.938Mb
    Format:
    PDF
    Download
    Author
    Spitzer, Aaron
    Chair
    Ehrlander, Mary
    Committee
    White, Graham
    Lovecraft, Amy
    Brock, David
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/11122/6077
    Abstract
    "Settler colonialism" presents a vexing challenge to voting rights theory and praxis in liberal-democratic states. I call this challenge "Kymlicka's dilemma," after Will Kymlicka, the political theorist who has led contemporary discourse on "minority nation" rights. As Kymlicka observed, members of a state's dominant cultural nation, or staatsvolk, may, by exercising universal mobility rights, numerically "swamp," and then, by using universal voting rights, democratically dominate, an Indigenous minority nation in its homeland. To prevent this, an Indigenous minority nation may seek to exercise group-based voting protections, such as guaranteed representation. Where "Kymlicka's dilemma" arises - i.e., where minority group-differentiated voting protections challenge the voting powers of individual staatsvolk and vice versa - a constitutional conflict seems certain. In Canada's Northwest Territories, from at least the 1970s until the separation of Nunavut in 1999, the specter of "Kymlicka's dilemma" (mis)shaped the constitutional evolution of the territorial government. There, in what was long Canada's last Indigenous-majority jurisdiction, decades of Indigenous political resistance to settler control hinged on the permissibility of Indigenous overrepresentation in the territorial legislature. In the 1990s, three developments portended changes to Indigenous overrepresentation in that legislature: Charter of Rights-inspired limits on electoral-district malapportionment, constitutional recognition of Indigenous group-based protections, and the amplified danger of settler "swamping" that would result from Nunavut's separation. As if in a natural experiment, these developments created conditions for a potentially volatile constitutional conflict. This thesis analyzes the results of that experiment. It shows that a constitutional conflict did ensue, catalyzed by the territorial electoral reapportionment of 1998-99. This conflict involved a yearlong political clash over Indigenous versus individual rights. This thesis further shows that a controversial court ruling, and equally controversial political decisions, resolved this conflict, deciding "Kymlicka's dilemma" by rejecting Indigenous group-differentiated voting protections in the territorial legislature.
    Description
    Thesis (M.A.) University of Alaska Fairbanks, 2015
    Date
    2015-08
    Type
    Thesis
    Collections
    Arctic and Northern Studies

    entitlement

     
    ABOUT US|HELP|BROWSE|ADVANCED SEARCH

    The University of Alaska Fairbanks is an affirmative action/equal opportunity employer and educational institution and is a part of the University of Alaska system.

    ©UAF 2013 - 2023 | Questions? ua-scholarworks@alaska.edu | Last modified: September 25, 2019

    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.