ScholarWorks@UA

Circulation Analysis Two Ways: In-house & OCLC Collection Evaluation

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Hassler, H. Caroline
dc.date.accessioned 2015-11-21T02:40:57Z
dc.date.available 2015-11-21T02:40:57Z
dc.date.issued 2015-11
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/11122/6211
dc.description.abstract The University of Alaska Southeast Egan Library has been analyzing circulation data for several years using reports from the Sirsi-Dynix ILS and freely available online tag cloud generating tools. Librarians use these tools to produce lists of most highly circulating items and subjects. These lists are used to guide collection development. In 2015, the library purchased a subscription to OCLC’s Collection Evaluation tool. The library does not use any other OCLC Worldshare Management Services. The library uploaded circulation data into OCLC Collection Evaluation and created reports available in that system. This poster session will compare the type of reports generated using locally-created methods with the reports generated using OCLC Collection Evaluation and look how each can contribute to effective collection assessment, collection development, and weeding. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.source Poster presented at the Charleston Library Conference, Charleston, S.C., November 6, 2015 en_US
dc.subject Library Science; Collection Development; en_US
dc.title Circulation Analysis Two Ways: In-house & OCLC Collection Evaluation en_US
dc.title.alternative Two Ways of Performing Circulation Analysis: Comparing In-house Methods with OCLC Collection Evaluation en_US
dc.type Poster en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ScholarWorks@UA


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics