Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHassler, H. Caroline
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-21T02:40:57Z
dc.date.available2015-11-21T02:40:57Z
dc.date.issued2015-11
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11122/6211
dc.description.abstractThe University of Alaska Southeast Egan Library has been analyzing circulation data for several years using reports from the Sirsi-Dynix ILS and freely available online tag cloud generating tools. Librarians use these tools to produce lists of most highly circulating items and subjects. These lists are used to guide collection development. In 2015, the library purchased a subscription to OCLC’s Collection Evaluation tool. The library does not use any other OCLC Worldshare Management Services. The library uploaded circulation data into OCLC Collection Evaluation and created reports available in that system. This poster session will compare the type of reports generated using locally-created methods with the reports generated using OCLC Collection Evaluation and look how each can contribute to effective collection assessment, collection development, and weeding.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.sourcePoster presented at the Charleston Library Conference, Charleston, S.C., November 6, 2015en_US
dc.subjectLibrary Science; Collection Development;en_US
dc.titleCirculation Analysis Two Ways: In-house & OCLC Collection Evaluationen_US
dc.title.alternativeTwo Ways of Performing Circulation Analysis: Comparing In-house Methods with OCLC Collection Evaluationen_US
dc.typePosteren_US
refterms.dateFOA2020-03-05T12:19:34Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Hassler_Charleston 2015.pdf
Size:
5.973Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record