• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • University of Alaska Fairbanks
    • UAF Graduate School
    • Anthropology
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • University of Alaska Fairbanks
    • UAF Graduate School
    • Anthropology
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of Scholarworks@UACommunitiesPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeThis CollectionPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsType

    My Account

    Login

    First Time Submitters, Register Here

    Register

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Ancient Celts: myth, invention or reality? Dental affinities among continental and non- continental Celtic groups

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    Anctil_uaf_0006N_10524.pdf
    Size:
    8.867Mb
    Format:
    PDF
    Download
    Author
    Anctil, Mallory J.
    Chair
    Hemphill, Brian
    Irish, Joel D.
    Committee
    Clark, Jamie L.
    Potter, Ben
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/11122/6802
    Abstract
    Dental anthropological study of the proto-Celts, and continental and non-continental Celtic tribes during the Iron Age, particularly its applicability in estimating biological affinities of these tribes, has been generally overlooked. The present study helps fill the gap in the current understanding of these groups in several ways. First, 36 morphological traits in 125 dentitions from four regional samples, representing the proto-Celts, the continental and non-continental Celts, along with a comparative European Iron Age sample, were recorded and analyzed. Frequencies of occurrence for each dental and osseous nonmetric trait were recorded for each sample. Second, the suite of traits was then compared among samples using principal components analysis, (PCA), and the Mean Measure of Divergence (MMD) distance statistic. Multidimensional scaling and cluster analysis were subsequently employed on the triangular pairwise MMD distance matrix to graphically illustrate the relationships between samples. These biological distance estimates suggest the following: 1) dental phenetic heterogeneity is evident across samples, 2) the proto-Celtic sample does not show any evidence of population continuity with the continental Celtic sample, 3) there is a significant difference between continental and non-continental Celtic samples, and 4) there is a comparably significant difference among the Celtic, proto-Celtic and comparative samples. Simply put, the comparative results suggest that these groups represent biologically distinct populations. These findings were compared with published cultural, linguistic, genetic and bioarchaeological information to test for concordance between dental analysis and other lines of evidence. Several previous studies defined the Celts linguistically, using languages to link all the populations. The present study does not support these findings, and suggests there is more genetic diversity than previously assumed under this linguistic hypothesis. Thus, it appears that the transition from proto-Celtic to Celtic culture in these regions, and the subsequent spread of Celtic culture to Britain during the La Tène period, may have been primarily a cultural transition. The present study comprises the most comprehensive dental morphological analysis of the Celts to date, contributes to an improved understanding of Celtic tribal relationships and microevolution, and provides an initial impression of Celtic relationships to other European populations during the Iron Age.
    Description
    Thesis (M.A.) University of Alaska Fairbanks, 2016
    Table of Contents
    Chapter 1: Introduction -- Chapter 2: Historical and archaeological background -- Archaeological culture and ethnicity -- Hallstatt Archaeological background, location, and spread -- Why Hallstatt D is believed to be proto-Celtic -- La Tène Archaeological background, location, and spread -- Why La Tène culture is believed to represent fully a Celtic material culture -- Evidence of cultural continuity from Hallstatt D to La Tène (A) -- Chapter 3: Continental and non-continental Celts -- Archaeological evidence for the presence of the non-continental Celts -- Linguistic evidence for the presence of the continental and non-continental Celts -- Genetic evidence for the presence of biologically distinct continental and non-continental Celtic populations -- Summary -- Chapter 4: Methodological background -- Dental anthropology -- Microevolutionary dental analysis -- Disadvantages of using teeth as a research tool -- Advantages of using teeth as a research tool -- Chapter 5: Materials and methods -- British Isles Cemeteries -- Rudston Makeshift Cemetery -- Garton Station -- Burton Fleming -- Wetwang Slack -- Kirkburn -- Continental Celtic sample: Munsingen-Rain -- Continental proto-Celtic sample: Hallstatt -- Comparative sample: Pontecagnano -- Methods: data collection -- Quantitative analysis -- Principal components analysis (PCA) -- Mean measure of divergence (MMD) -- Multidimensional scaling -- Chapter 6: Results -- Principal components analysis -- Mean measure of divergence -- Multidimensional scaling -- Hierarchal cluster analysis -- Chapter 7: Discussion, conclusions and future research -- Discussion -- Was population movement from continental Celtic populations (i.e., from Munsingen-Rain) outside Gaul responsible for the diachronic changes in material culture in Yorkshire during the Iron Age? -- Is there evidence for population continuity or discontinuity between the Hallstatt D (i.e., Hallstatt D) and La Tène (i.e., Munsingen-Rain) samples? -- Is there sufficient evidence to suggest that the inhabitants of Yorkshire during the Iron Age were Celtic or is it a nominal association based on cultural diffusion? -- Is there a specific dental complex that can be identified among the Celtic populations that serves to unite the continental and non-continental Celts? -- Does the continental Celtic Munsingen-Rain population represent a biologically distinct population? -- Summary and conclusions -- Future work -- References -- Appendix.
    Date
    2016-08
    Type
    Thesis
    Collections
    Anthropology

    entitlement

     
    ABOUT US|HELP|BROWSE|ADVANCED SEARCH

    The University of Alaska Fairbanks is an affirmative action/equal opportunity employer and educational institution and is a part of the University of Alaska system.

    ©UAF 2013 - 2023 | Questions? ua-scholarworks@alaska.edu | Last modified: September 25, 2019

    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.