• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • University of Alaska Fairbanks
    • UAF Graduate School
    • Geosciences
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • University of Alaska Fairbanks
    • UAF Graduate School
    • Geosciences
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of Scholarworks@UACommunitiesPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeThis CollectionPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsType

    My Account

    Login

    First Time Submitters, Register Here

    Register

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Mobile metal ionization: effectiveness in gold exploration

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    Forbush_uaf_0006N_10513.pdf
    Size:
    27.18Mb
    Format:
    PDF
    Download
    Author
    Forbush, Tyson John
    Chair
    Newberry, Rainer
    Committee
    Layer, Paul
    Hayes, Sarah
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/11122/6868
    Abstract
    A series of investigations and tests vetting the proprietary Mobile Metal Ion™ (MMI) technique for its effectiveness specifically in regards to identify Au concentrations in the subsurface. The Marigold Mine, north central NV, and the Gil Prospect, Interior AK, near Fairbanks, provide two site areas under active exploration and development in drastically contrasting environments. MMI has been widely available as an alternative to conventional soil geochemical methods since the 1990's, during which time it has been used successfully to identify several base metal deposits, mostly in arid climates. Criticisms and reluctance from industry to use the method generally stem from the poor understanding of ion migration mechanisms in the subsurface, and the proprietary extractants' undisclosed composition. While MMI has shown promise in the identification of large base metal deposits, Au is significantly less mobile than other metals at the near surface; a detailed investigation of MMI's ability to identify buried Au deposits is yet to be documented. This thesis conducts a critical review of MMI's overall effectiveness at identifying Au in the subsurface through a combination of small studies investigating both its analytical and geological reproducibility, and comparisons of soil anomalies to subsurface Au identified through drilling. Marigold areas tested with MMI (2007-2009, 2012) are currently being mined, allowing best-case scenario comparisons between ore grade and surface response; whereas at Gil investigations compare MMI responses to total organic carbon (TOC) profiles in soil cores, and test the method's usefulness in variably permafrost-rich soils. Both sites provide comparisons to conventional methods illustrating: MMI's advantages over conventional techniques in situations with between 5 to <100 meters alluvial cover; ineffectiveness over deposits with >100 meters alluvial cover; an interesting case where both MMI and conventional methods identified different portions of a deposit but neither method successfully defined it in its entirety; and strange inter-elemental correlations in the MMI data that appear to be reflecting how metals concentrate in the soils rather than reflecting bedrock metal correlations. Data also identify how some metals (e.g. As, Bi, Co, Fe, and Zn) preferentially concentrate in the A horizon soils, whereas others such as Au and Ba concentrate in the B horizon. Such results question our generally accepted models of how metals concentrate in soils. The A horizon (commonly considered the zone of leaching) is thought to have lower metal concentrations than the B horizon (zone of accumulation). However if these data are representative, then certain elements preferentially concentrate in the A horizon. Such knowledge will have serious implications on sampling protocols and interpretation of geochemical soil surveys in general.
    Description
    Thesis (M.S.) University of Alaska Fairbanks, 2016
    Table of Contents
    Chapter 1:Introduction -- Chapter 2: Geochemistry of the Marigold Deposit Mineralization -- Chapter 3: Mobile Metal Ion Investigations of the Marigold Deposit -- Chapter 4: Geochemical Investigations of the Gil Prospect, Alaska -- Chapter 5: Discussion and Conclusions -- References -- Appendices.
    Date
    2016-08
    Type
    Thesis
    Collections
    Geosciences

    entitlement

     
    ABOUT US|HELP|BROWSE|ADVANCED SEARCH

    The University of Alaska is an affirmative action/equal opportunity employer, educational institution and provider and prohibits illegal discrimination against any individual.

    Learn more about UA’s notice of nondiscrimination.

    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.