• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • University of Alaska Fairbanks
    • UAF Graduate School
    • Engineering
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • University of Alaska Fairbanks
    • UAF Graduate School
    • Engineering
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of Scholarworks@UACommunitiesPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeThis CollectionPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsType

    My Account

    Login

    First Time Submitters, Register Here

    Register

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Life after CHOPS: the Alaskan heavy oil reservoir perspective

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    Mathur_B_2017.pdf
    Size:
    12.62Mb
    Format:
    PDF
    Download
    Author
    Mathur, Bakul
    Chair
    Dandekar, Abhijit
    Khataniar, Santanu
    Committee
    Patil, Shirish
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/11122/7623
    Abstract
    The heavy oil reservoirs in Alaska offer major production challenges, including proximity to the permafrost layer, very high viscosity oil and low mechanical strength pay zones. The Ugnu deposits of the Alaska North Slope (ANS) hold more than 6 billion barrels of oil. The dead oil viscosity at reservoir temperature ranges from 1,000 to 1,000,000 cp1. In an effort to sustain well life, this research focuses on the unique set of challenges occurring in the Ugnu reservoir and presents the best possible way to maximize production. The present research accentuates observations derived from the field data, which shows that deliberate sand production with the hydrocarbon stream while employing a Progressive Cavity Pump (PCP) as an artificial lift method has a favorable effect on primary oil recovery. The developments have led to the advent of a technique called Cold Heavy Oil Production with Sand (CHOPS) as an initial production method for shallow heavy oil reservoirs. Sand production leads to the formation of high porosity channels or wormholes that can range up to hundreds of meters. The co-mingling of heavy oil and sand develops foamy oil by creating a bubbly flow inside the reservoir. The combination of these wormholes with the foamy oil behavior are the primary factors that result in enhanced production during CHOPS. One of the major hindrances to its successful application is the selection of the post-CHOPS production method, which is addressed in this study with the help of modeling and simulation. Alternative recovery techniques following the primary cold production include water flooding, polymer injection, miscible gas injection and thermal recovery methods. Water flooding is unviable because of the mobility contrast between the highly viscous oil and water. The high permeability zones provide a bypass for water, consequently producing elevated water cuts. Another aspect unique to Alaskan heavy oil reservoirs is the proximity to the permafrost layer, with the hydrocarbon bearing zone making thermal recovery methods unappealing. Polymer injection and miscible gas injection become the favorable non-thermal secondary and tertiary recovery methods in this case. This study is based on modeling one of the wells drilled into the M80 sands of the Ugnu formation followed by the analysis of post-CHOPS recovery for the well. The CHOPS well modeling is done with the help of a wormhole fractal pattern and a foamy oil model. Simulation of the polymer injection is then employed from a nearby well. The results indicate almost 12% increment in recovery with polymer flooding as compared to the natural depletion. The recovery obtained from the simulations have been analyzed to provide a basis for designing the polymer injection job as an Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) method after CHOPS. With the promising results of this study, it can be determined that the Ugnu reservoir sands can be exploited for heavy oil with the help of polymer flooding. It can also be combined with miscible gas flooding or alkali-surfactant flooding to obtain even higher hydrocarbon recoveries.
    Description
    Thesis (M.S.) University of Alaska Fairbanks, 2017
    Table of Contents
    Chapter 1. Introduction -- 1.1 Alaska's Heavy Oil Potential -- 1.2 Cold Heavy Oil Production with Sand (CHOPS) -- 1.3 Research Structure. Chapter 2. Literature review -- 2.1 Ugnu Geology -- 2.2 Significant Recovery Mechanisms of CHOPS -- 2.3 Modeling the CHOPS Process -- 2.3.1 Modeling Wormhole Propagation -- 2.3.1.1 Geo-mechanical Models -- 2.3.1.2 Probabilistic Models -- 2.3.2 Fluid Modeling -- 2.3.2.1 Pseudo Bubble Point Model -- 2.3.2.2 Modified Fractional Flow Model -- 2.3.2.3 Reduced Viscosity Model -- 2.3.2.4 Non-equilibrium Reaction Model -- 2.4 Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) After CHOPS -- 2.4.1 Water Flooding -- 2.4.2 Polymer Flooding. Chapter 3. Model construction and validation -- 3.1 Available Data -- 3.2 Model Construction -- 3.2.1 Fluid Model Construction -- 3.2.2 Reservoir Model Construction -- 3.2.2.1 Wormhole Pattern Generation -- 3.3 Model Initialization and Validation. Chapter 4. Post-chops recovery optimization -- 4.1 Water Flooding -- 4.2 Polymer Flooding -- 4.2.1 Polymer Selection -- 4.2.2 Polymer Concentration Optimization -- 4.2.3 Injection Time Optimization -- 4.2.4 Slug Size Optimization -- 4.2.5 Well Spacing. Chapter 5. Discussion of results. Chapter 6. Conclusions and recommendations -- 6.1 Conclusions -- 6.2 Recommendations. References -- Appendix.
    Date
    2017-05
    Type
    Thesis
    Collections
    Engineering

    entitlement

     
    ABOUT US|HELP|BROWSE|ADVANCED SEARCH

    The University of Alaska Fairbanks is an affirmative action/equal opportunity employer and educational institution and is a part of the University of Alaska system.

    ©UAF 2013 - 2023 | Questions? ua-scholarworks@alaska.edu | Last modified: September 25, 2019

    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.