Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHarper, Hugh
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-13T20:24:42Z
dc.date.available2017-09-13T20:24:42Z
dc.date.issued2017-08
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11122/7878
dc.descriptionThesis (M.S.) University of Alaska Fairbanks, 2017en_US
dc.description.abstractThe 2002 Mw7.9 Denali fault earthquake was among the largest intraplate earthquakes on record, and the ongoing crustal deformation of the event is still observed today. Understanding the deformation patterns in the years following the earthquake can give insight into the viscoelastic properties of the crust and upper mantle. Additionally, an accurate and predictive model of this deformation is essential to developing and increasingly complete tectonic model of Alaska. Using primarily GPS measurements, deformation can be measured to millimeter-level precision. To develop a coseismic and postseismic model of the earthquake, 224 GPS coseismic displacement measurements (along with SAR and geologic measurements from past studies) are inverted for fault slip distribution. Coseismic slip and consequent stress changes drive the forward postseismic deformation model, which is constrained by 119 postseismic GPS time series. Both models use a 1D elastic structure. The preferred 1D coseismic model fits the coseismic data with a weighted residual sum of squares (WRSS) of 4.86e3 m², with more deep slip than a homogeneous model and a geodetic moment of 8.92e20 N m (Mw 7.97). The Maxwell viscoelastic parameters used for the first postseismic model run are 3e19 Pa s for the lower crust; 5e18 Pa s for the viscoelastic shear zone; and 10e19 and 10e20 south and north of the fault, respectively, for the asthenosphere. The respective Kelvin parameters are all an order of magnitude less. The deep coseismic slip (a product of the 1D elastic model) eliminates the need to add deep slip, which was done in past studies. Based on time series analysis, the decade-plus of data will certainly improve the model prediction relative to previous models, but future observations will be needed to verify this. No preferred postseismic model is developed, and more postseismic models will be run to better fit the observations.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectDenali Park Earthquake, Alaska, 2002en_US
dc.subjectStrike-slip faults (Geology)en_US
dc.subjectAlaskaen_US
dc.subjectInterior Alaskaen_US
dc.subjectEarthquakesen_US
dc.titleModeling the coseismic and postseismic deformation of the 2002 Mw7.9 Denali, AK earthquakeen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.type.degreemsen_US
dc.identifier.departmentDepartment of Geosciencesen_US
dc.contributor.chairFreymueller, Jeffrey T.
dc.contributor.committeeChristensen, Douglas
dc.contributor.committeeHoltkamp, Stephen
dc.contributor.committeeTape, Carl
refterms.dateFOA2020-03-05T14:38:37Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Harper_H_2017.pdf
Size:
15.16Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record