• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • University of Alaska Fairbanks
    • UAF Graduate School
    • Engineering
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • University of Alaska Fairbanks
    • UAF Graduate School
    • Engineering
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of Scholarworks@UACommunitiesPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeThis CollectionPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsType

    My Account

    Login

    First Time Submitters, Register Here

    Register

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Climatic and physiographic drivers of peak flows in watersheds in the North Slope of Alaska

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    Hinzman_A_2017.pdf
    Size:
    11.43Mb
    Format:
    PDF
    Download
    Author
    Hinzman, Alexa Marion Hassebroek
    Chair
    Stuefer, Svetlana
    Committee
    Arp, Christopher
    Barnes, David
    Keyword
    Watersheds
    Alaska
    North Slope
    Kuparuk River Watershed (Alaska)
    Runoff
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/11122/7881
    Abstract
    The failure to accurately predict peak discharge can cause large errors in risk analysis that may lead to damage to structures and in some cases, death. Creating linear regression (LR) equations that accurately predict peak discharges without historic data provides a method to estimate flood peaks in ungauged watersheds on the North Slope of Alaska. This thesis looks at the independent variables that drive, or are significant in predicting snowmelt peak discharge in the North Slope watersheds. The LR equations created use independent variables from meteorological data and physiographic data collected from four watersheds, Putuligayuk River, Upper Kuparuk River, Imnavait Creek and Roche Moutonnée Creek. Meteorological data include snow water equivalent (SWE), total precipitation, rainfall, storage, length of melt. Physiographic data summarize watershed area (2.2 km2 to 471 km2) and slope (0.15:100 to 2.7:100). This thesis compared various Flood Frequency Analysis techniques, starting with Bulletin 17B, multiple USGS regional methods and finally created LR equations for each watershed as well as all four watersheds combined. Five LR equations were created, three of the LR equations found SWE to be a significant predictor of peak flows. The first equation to estimate peak flows for all watersheds used only area and had a high R2 value of 0.72. The second equation for all watersheds included area and a meteorological independent variable, SWE. While the evidence presented here is quite promising that meteorological and physiographic data can be useful in estimating peak flows in ungauged Arctic watersheds, the limitations of using only four watersheds to determine the equations call for further testing and verification. More validation studies will be needed to demonstrate that viable equations may be applied to all watersheds on the North Slope of Alaska.
    Description
    Thesis (M.S.) University of Alaska Fairbanks, 2017
    Table of Contents
    Chapter 1 Introduction -- 1.1 The Importance of estimating peak discharge -- 1.2 Users of information on peak flows -- 1.3 Current gaps in peak flows knowledge -- 1.4 Research questions. Chapter 2 Background and study area -- 2.1 Common features -- 2.2 Imnavait Creek -- 2.3 Upper Kuparuk River -- 2.4 Putuligayuk River -- 2.5 Roche Moutonnée River. Chapter 3 Data and data collection -- 3.1 Streamflow -- 3.2 Precipitation -- 3.3 Storage. Chapter 4 Methods -- 4.1 Flood frequency analysis for gauged watersheds --4.2 Ungauged watersheds -- 4.3 Linear regression model equations -- 4.3.1 Single variable linear regression comparison -- 4.3.2 Multiple linear regression -- 4.3.3 Landscape characteristics. Chapter 5 Results -- 5.1 Hydrographs and peak flows -- 5.2 Flood frequency analysis -- 5.2.1 Upper Kuparuk River -- 5.2.2 Putuligayuk River -- 5.2.3 Imnavait Creek -- 5.2.4 Roche Moutonnée Creek -- 5.2.5 Comparison of FFA methods between watersheds -- 5.3 Linear regression analysis --5.3.1 Simple linear regression analysis -- 5.3.1.1 Upper Kuparuk River -- 5.3.1.2 Putuligayuk River -- 5.3.1.3 Imnavait Creek -- 5.3.1.4 All watersheds -- 5.3.1.5 SWE frequency analysis -- 5.3.2 Simple or multiple linear regression equations -- 5.3.2.1 Upper Kuparuk River -- 5.3.2.2 Putuligayuk River -- 5.3.2.3 Imnavait Creek -- 5.3.2.4 All watersheds -- 5.3.3 Multiple linear regression. Chapter 6 Discussion -- Chapter 7 Conclusions -- Literature cited -- Appendix.
    Date
    2017-08
    Type
    Thesis
    Collections
    Engineering

    entitlement

     
    ABOUT US|HELP|BROWSE|ADVANCED SEARCH

    The University of Alaska is an affirmative action/equal opportunity employer, educational institution and provider and prohibits illegal discrimination against any individual.

    Learn more about UA’s notice of nondiscrimination.

    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.