Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGroh, Cliff
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-07T23:18:27Z
dc.date.available2018-08-07T23:18:27Z
dc.date.issued2018-04-18
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11122/9165
dc.description.abstractI n early 2003, financial analysts gave Alaska state officials some very bad news: the two largest pension systems for public employees wouldn’t have the money to cover all the expected future costs of pensions and health-care benefits for state and local employees when they retired. This shortfall—called the unfunded liability— had been caused by, among other things, several years of poor returns on fund investments and soaring health-care costs. Public pensions are protected in Alaska’s constitution, and the state has already contributed nearly $7 billion to reduce the shortfall. How much more it will need to pay is uncertain, since it depends on many things that are hard to predict. But most analysts believe it will be billions more. That poses a major challenge for the state—which has been dealing with big budget deficits—and for local governments, which need to help pay the unfunded liability but have far smaller financial reserves than the state.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherInstitute of Social and Economic Research, University of Alaska Anchorageen_US
dc.subjectAlaskaen_US
dc.subjectpension systemsen_US
dc.titleHow Is the State Dealing With the Shortfall in Pension Systems?en_US
dc.title.alternativeResearch Summary No. 86en_US
dc.typeReporten_US
refterms.dateFOA2020-03-06T01:24:16Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
2018_04_09-RS86-PensionSystemS ...
Size:
594.2Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record