• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • University of Alaska Fairbanks
    • UAF Graduate School
    • Biological Sciences
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • University of Alaska Fairbanks
    • UAF Graduate School
    • Biological Sciences
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of Scholarworks@UACommunitiesPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeThis CollectionPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsType

    My Account

    Login

    First Time Submitters, Register Here

    Register

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Predator-prey dynamics between mountain lions and mule deer: Effects on distribution, population regulation, habitat selection, and prey selection

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    Pierce_B_1999.pdf
    Size:
    3.149Mb
    Format:
    PDF
    Download
    Author
    Pierce, Becky Miranda
    Chair
    Bowyer, R. T.
    Bleich, V. C.
    Keyword
    Ecology
    Zoology
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/11122/9543
    Abstract
    Mountain lions (Puma concolor) and mule deer ( Odocoileus hemionus), which share a winter range in the Eastern Sierra Nevada in Round Valley, California, USA, were fitted with radio-telemetry collars and tracked to determine their movements and cause of mortality. The mountain lion population of Round Valley refers to a group of individuals that lived in close proximity to one another, essentially isolated from similar groups during the winter, and fed on the migratory herd of mule deer that overwinter in Round Valley. Mountain lions migrated seasonally with the deer population, and two distinct patterns for coping with variability in abundance of prey were observed. The unique migratory behavior identified for the mountain lions in this study indicates a more flexible social system for mountain lions than previously described. Tests of whether the presence of another mountain lion affected where individuals to killed deer indicated that social interactions had no effect and that social behavior was not regulating the population of mountain lions via spatial partitioning of prey. Examination of habitat selection by mule deer and mountain lions revealed that mule deer selected habitat at higher elevations (P < 0.001) with more bitterbrush ( Purshia tridentata) and less rabbitbrush (Chrysothamnus nauseosum ) than random locations. Mountain lions killed deer in relatively open areas with more desert peach (Prunus andersonii) than locations in which deer foraged. Those results indicated that deer were not confronted with a tradeoff in terms of habitat selection on the winter range because habitat with the best forage (e.g. bitterbrush), also provided the least predation risk. Comparisons of mule deer killed by mountain lions, coyotes, and automobiles indicated that mountain lions selected young (<1 year old) deer and both predators selected older age classes among adults. Furthermore, there was no selection by either predator for animals in poor condition. Among mountain lions in different social categories, female mountain lions with kittens selected more young deer than did other social categories. This study indicated that ambush predators (mountain lions) may be as selective for prey as coursing predators (coyotes) and that lactation in mountain lions may play a role in determining prey selection. ion.
    Description
    Dissertation (Ph.D.) University of Alaska Fairbanks, 1999
    Date
    1999
    Type
    Dissertation
    Collections
    Biological Sciences

    entitlement

     
    ABOUT US|HELP|BROWSE|ADVANCED SEARCH

    The University of Alaska Fairbanks is an affirmative action/equal opportunity employer and educational institution and is a part of the University of Alaska system.

    ©UAF 2013 - 2023 | Questions? ua-scholarworks@alaska.edu | Last modified: September 25, 2019

    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.