Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLoeffler, Bob
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-08T22:52:08Z
dc.date.available2018-08-08T22:52:08Z
dc.date.issued2014-12-01
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11122/9571
dc.description.abstractPoliticians and planners work to attract economic development because of the desire to provide jobs and income for residents, and to find tax revenue to fund government services. Their focus is usually statewide: jobs, income, and taxes for Alaskans. This article is about the impact of one remote development project on nearby, Native communities. It is about the community effects of the Red Dog Lead and Zinc Mine in northwest Alaska. 2014 was the 25th anniversary for the mine, which began operation in 1989. This case study evaluates the mine’s effects on the communities after 25 years of operation. It begins with an overview of the communities and the mine. It evaluates the mine’s effects on these communities in four ways: 1) jobs and income, 2) governance, 3) education, and 4) subsistence. This case study provides lessons for development in other rural communitiesen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherInternational Economic Development Councilen_US
dc.sourceEconomic Development Journalen_US
dc.subjectAlaskaen_US
dc.subjectminingen_US
dc.subjectRed Dog Mineen_US
dc.titleMining and Sustainable Communities: A Case Study of the Red Dog Mineen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.description.peerreviewYesen_US
refterms.dateFOA2020-03-06T02:16:49Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
2015-MiningAndSustainableCommu ...
Size:
481.9Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record