Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorReynolds, Douglas
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-26T00:39:11Z
dc.date.available2019-01-26T00:39:11Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11122/9757
dc.descriptionWorking Paperen_US
dc.description.abstractA monopsony is a single buyer for multiple suppliers where the buyer forces the suppliers to pay lower than normal prices. An example of a monopsony is a single employer hiring multiple workers and where the workers have no competitive choice about where else to work and so are forced to accept lower than normal wages offered by the monopsonist. The same situation can happen with oil. Here we show a situation from 1965 to 1974 where Saudi Arabia and OPEC were forced to accept monopsonistic oil prices given by the U.S. and the West, a situation that may actually violate the U.S. Sherman act of 1890.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectPetroleum, Monopsony, Saudi Arabia, U.S. Oil companiesen_US
dc.titleEvidence of a Monopsony: The U.S. and Saudi Arabia before 1974en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
refterms.dateFOA2020-03-28T01:25:18Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
WP Reynolds SA Monopsony.docx
Size:
117.0Kb
Format:
Microsoft Word 2007
Description:
Working Paper Main Article

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record