Files
Download Full Text (744 KB)
Description
Federal policy governing indigenous peoples in Canada has been marked by repeated glances south and west (at Alaska) as it has been formed through parliamentary edict, case law and Constitutional entrenchment. Although rooted in a common Crown policy, the discrete history of Canadian policy has diverged from American practice even as the country's historical and its political development have diverged. Unlike United States policy, the underpinnings of Canadian Indian law as it related to aboriginal title land rights and the limits and potential of tribal sovereignty are only now coming into focus. This belated articulation of Indian rights parallels similar developments in Alaska where land rights and tribal rights are only now being defined. In both Alaska and Canada, hunting and fishing rights and tribal governance are political and legal matters whose impact on resource development and control by provinces and states make neat application of older Indian law concepts less predictable. Cases in either place offer guidance to federal courts in either country within a modern debate over public land rights. The author suggests that attorneys in each place monitor case law and legislation only now emerging.
Publication Date
4-13-1990
Keywords
Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act (ANILCA), Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (ANCSA), Alaska Natives, bush justice, Canada, Canadian First Nations, Indian law, rural justice, sovereignty, subsistence
Recommended Citation
N/A, Conn, "Why Canadian Indian Law Is Important to Alaskans, Why Indian Law in Alaska Is Important to Canada" (1990). Conference papers. 48.
https://scholarworks.alaska.edu/uaa_justice_papers/48
Handle
http://hdl.handle.net/11122/10741